Multicomponent perinatal breastfeeding support in women with BMI >25: The Latch On multi-centre randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a multicomponent breastfeeding support intervention on breastfeeding prevalence at 3 months among women with a body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 . DESIGN: Multicentre multicomponent randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four maternity centres in Ireland. POPULATION: A total of 225 primiparous women and their nominated support partners. Participants were aged 18 years and over, with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 , carrying a singleton pregnancy and without contraindication for breastfeeding. METHODS: The intervention included an antenatal group breastfeeding education session for participants and their support partners, followed by a planned postnatal breastfeeding assessment and telephone support for up to 6 weeks by a lactation consultant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Any breastfeeding at 3 months postpartum. RESULTS: Any breastfeeding prevalence was 68.7% (n = 68) in the intervention group and 62.1% (n = 59) in the control group at 3 months postpartum (odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 0.72-2.46, p = 0.36). Any and exclusive breastfeeding rates did not significantly differ at any other time point. More women in the control group accessed support from private lactation consultants (intervention 23.5% [n = 12], control 45.3% [n = 24], p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The control group had higher than expected breastfeeding rates, and the study found no evidence of effect on the primary outcome. Providing comprehensive education and support for women intending to breastfeed remains of paramount importance.

Women's experiences of Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) and of attending a dedicated multi-disciplinary hydration clinic.

PROBLEM: Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy that affects 1-3 % of women and has profound nutritional, physical and psychological consequences. Previous research identified that women with HG report inadequate infrastructure for day case management. INTRODUCTION: A multi-disciplinary HG day case service (IRIS Hydration Clinic) was launched and provides routine care for women with HG in a dedicated unit. The multi-disciplinary team involves midwives, dietitians, obstetricians and perinatal mental health. AIMS: To explore women's experiences of HG and of attending the dedicated clinic. METHODS: Ten interviews were conducted with women who attended the clinic. Data were transcribed and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. FINDINGS: The physical and psychological impact of HG was captured. The appreciation for the dedicated clinic was a common theme, regarding having somewhere specific for treatment rather than ad-hoc treatment. 'Relationships' was a significant theme - women described the benefits of continuity of care and the positive impact of peer support. Areas for improvement were explored, such as expansion and extra sensitivity around some women's issues around weight gain/loss. DISCUSSION: HG causes significant ill-health and its impact remains undervalued. Women had highly positive experiences of attending the dedicated HG clinic. The impact of continuity and individualized care in a day-case setting improved women's experiences of this condition. CONCLUSION: The dedicated HG clinic was highly valued by women experiencing the condition. The IRIS clinic provides much-needed validation for a medical condition with little understanding from the general public or many healthcare professionals.

The importance of communication and involvement in decision-making: A study in Ireland exploring birth satisfaction using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation in healthcare services has become a priority, globally1. The Government of Ireland has highlighted the importance of stakeholder engagement to identify the needs of women in the design and delivery of high-quality health services, driven by necessity rather than financial ability2. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R), an internationally validated tool, and recommended for measuring childbirth satisfaction by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM)3; however, it has yet to be considered in the Irish context. The aim of the study was to explore birth satisfaction with a sample of new mothers in Ireland. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted including a survey that involved collection of data from the BSS-R 10-item questionnaire from 307 mothers over an 8-week period in 2019, in one urban maternity hospital in Ireland. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Qualitative data from the free-text comments of the survey questions were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Overall, women reported positive relationships with their care providers and were satisfied with the communication and support they received, as well as high levels of control and choice. Postnatal care, however, was highlighted as being less satisfactory with staffing levels described as inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding women's birth experiences and what is important to them could facilitate midwives and other health professionals to improve the quality of their care and develop guidelines and policies that focus on women and their families' needs. The vast majority of women rated their birthing experience as extremely positive. The main elements of care that contributed to a positive birthing experience for women were quality relationships with clinicians, choice and control, and emotional safety.

'Labour Hopscotch': Women's evaluation of using the steps during labor.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns have been expressed globally about the decline in rates of physiological birth and rising intervention rates during labor and birth. The 'Labour Hopscotch' Framework, a visual depiction of steps required to remain active during labor was implemented in a large tertiary maternity hospital in Ireland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the steps of the Labour Hopscotch women found most useful, examine the use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods of pain relief used during labor and finally to investigate the labor and birth outcomes of women who used 'Labour Hopscotch' during labor. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a study specific questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 809 women completed the questionnaire. The Labour Hopscotch Framework was positively evaluated. Mobilizing, the birthing ball, birthing stool, and water therapy were found to be the most useful steps. Primiparous women were more likely to use non-pharmacological methods of pain relief. Pharmacological methods used by women were entonox (67.5%), pethidine (8%) and epidural analgesia (38.5%). Primiparous women were more likely to have epidural analgesia than multiparous women (p<0.00001). Women that attended either private (p=0.004) or public-led obstetric (p=0.005) antenatal care were more likely to have epidural analgesia in labor. Women attending the community midwives were least likely to receive epidural analgesia during labor. The rates of spontaneous vaginal birth, assisted birth and cesarean section, were 77.1%, 14% and 8.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings contribute to the increasing national and international evidence that initiatives such as Labour Hopscotch can promote and advocate for women to be active and mobile during labor to support physiological birth.

Exploring midwives' experiences of implementing the Labour Hopscotch Framework: A midwifery innovation.

INTRODUCTION: Midwives are ideally placed to promote physiological birth and improve women's birth experiences. Freedom of movement in labor is highly recommended as it reduces a need for obstetric interventions in labor and prevents and corrects labor complications, such as poor progress and malposition of the fetus. The Labour Hopscotch Framework (LHF) provides women and midwives with a visual depiction of the steps they can undertake to remain active and, in this way, support physiological birth processes. The objective of this study was to explore midwives' experiences of supporting women during labor with the Labour Hopscotch Framework and identify any improvements necessary to the Labour Hopscotch Framework. METHODS: A two phased mixed-method sequential explanatory design study consisting of a survey (women, n=809 and partners, n=759) and focus group (n=8 midwives) was completed to evaluate the LHF following its implementation. This article presents the findings reporting midwives' perceptions of using the Labour Hopscotch Framework with women and their birthing partners. The setting was a large urban teaching maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, where eight midwives practiced in the following areas: labor suite, antenatal unit, and community midwifery. RESULTS: The Labour Hopscotch Framework was described as beneficial in promoting physiological birth, using a creative, attractive visual depiction to guide women in, and before, labor. The Labour Hopscotch Framework was deemed helpful in increasing midwifery students and newly qualified midwives' confidence to provide women with tangible, supportive assistance during labor and increased partners' involvement in the labor process. CONCLUSIONS: Labour Hopscotch Framework should be more widely promoted to all women attending the hospital for maternity care and a clear explanation of each step given and demonstrated to increase women's understanding of the steps within. Labour Hopscotch training should be included in midwifery education programs.

Latch On: A protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of perinatal support to improve breastfeeding outcomes in women with a raised BMI.

INTRODUCTION: Breastfeeding is associated with improved maternal and child outcomes. Women with a higher body mass index (BMI), who comprise about 50% of the population, are at increased risk of poorer breastfeeding practices and are a population who would benefit from breastfeeding. METHODS: This protocol is for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of perinatal breastfeeding support among primiparous women with a BMI >25 kg/m2, using a previously-tested, multi-component intervention. The primary outcome is any breastfeeding at 3 months. The intervention will support mothers and their partners and spans from late pregnancy to six weeks postpartum. Intervention components include group antenatal breastfeeding education, individual face-to-face education in the immediate postnatal period, professional support to six weeks' postpartum and weekly phone calls in the immediate postpartum period from an International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC). The intervention will target attitudes towards breastfeeding, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and subjective norms around infant feeding with the aim to normalise the behaviour. RESULTS: We anticipate that the intervention will be well-accepted and feasible to carry out within four maternity units in the East of Ireland. Furthermore, essential formative qualitative work has been conducted to inform the intervention design and to ensure that it is contextually appropriate. CONCLUSION: The proposed intervention will be invaluable to policy-makers in providing insights into what specific interventions are effective in improving breastfeeding rates for women with a raised BMI.

Perineal management: Midwives' confidence and educational needs.

OBJECTIVE: The overall aim of this study was to collate information to inform the updating of a perineal management educational programme for midwives. This paper explores midwives' confidence and educational needs in managing the woman's perineum during the second stage of labour, focusing on future quality initiatives to improve midwives' experiences and expertise in the prevention of perineal trauma during birth. DESIGN: A mixed-methods sequential exploratory design was used. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Midwives and clinical midwife managers assisting with births in the labour ward of a large urban university stand-alone maternity hospital in the Republic of Ireland with approximately 9,000 births per year participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire and two focus groups were used to collect the data. FINDINGS: Fifty-two midwives from a total of 64 eligible labour ward midwives completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 81.2%. Midwives indicated that perineal management workshops did not cover prevention of perineal trauma, and mainly focused on suturing and repair of the perineum. The majority of midwives (85%) indicated that they would like further education on the prevention of perineal trauma. Higher levels of confidence in making a decision to perform an episiotomy, infiltrating the perineum and at performing an episiotomy were reported in experienced midwives. Midwives want improved and additional education in the management of women's perinea during the second stage of labour and made various recommendations regarding the content, format, timing and frequency of the workshop. Suggestions for further education included techniques for preventing perineal trauma during labour and birth and how to perform an episiotomy. KEY CONCLUSIONS: This study provides key insights into midwives' confidence and educational needs in relation to managing the woman's perineum during the second stage of labour. The findings from this study demonstrates the appetite of midwives for additional education in the area of perineal management, particularly prevention strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Midwives play an essential role in reducing the rates of perineal trauma through regular education. It is therefore important that midwives keep up to date with the best available evidence. Updating existing perineal management educational programmes that are tailor made to midwives' needs could not only improve clinical skills and perineal protection techniques but also midwives' confidence in decision making. The overall aim is to reduce perineal trauma in women having a spontaneous vaginal birth.

Antenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding outcomes among mothers participating in a feasibility breastfeeding-support intervention.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding rates in Ireland are among the lowest worldwide. A feasibility study of a breastfeeding-support intervention explored maternal characteristics associated with antenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy and with infant-feeding mode at 6 weeks postpartum among women giving birth in Ireland. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study across two sites, urban and rural: The National Maternity Hospital (NMH), Dublin and Wexford General Hospital (WGH), Wexford. Nulliparous, pregnant women were recruited at approximately 32 weeks gestation from the hospitals' antenatal out-patient departments. Participants attended an antenatal class with a support partner, received a one-to-one session with a lactation consultant after delivery and had access to a breastfeeding-support clinic and telephone advice postpartum. Our aim was to understand maternal variables associated with breastfeeding self-efficacy and infant-feeding mode. We explored associations between continuous and categorical variables and any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding using t tests and Chi-squared analyses. RESULTS: One hundred mothers provided baseline data; 64 provided follow-up data. Lower maternal age and non-Irish nationality were associated with higher antenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy. At the rural unit, mothers with tertiary education were more likely to be exclusively breastfeeding than those with secondary education. Though not statistically significant, more normal-weight mothers from the urban unit were exclusively breastfeeding at 6 weeks than overweight/obese mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding outcomes differed by maternal education. Future interventions should target mothers with lower education and possibly also overweight and obese mothers. Increasing breastfeeding self-efficacy, particularly among older and Irish-born mothers, may be a mechanism for improving breastfeeding outcomes.

Bereavement care education and training in clinical practice: Supporting the development of confidence in student midwives.

AIMS: To improve the confidence in student Midwives to provide bereavement careto parents following pregnancy loss and perinatal death. BACKGROUND: The one-day interactive Educational Training Workshop in Bereavement Care (ETWBC) was developed for student midwives in their final year of their B.Sc. Midwifery Degree Programme and those completing a Higher Diploma in Midwifery to help improve their confidence to provide bereavement care in clinical practice. DESIGN: A longitudinal sequential mixed-methods design was used to evaluate the outcome and processes of participation in the Workshop. This paper reports on the outcome evaluation. METHODS: Participants completed the study questionnaires at all 3 time points: pre/post workshop and 3 month follow-up. Thirty nine of the 41 student midwives (Higher Diploma and 4th year B.Sc.) participated in the workshop. 97.44% (n = 38) of the participants completed all the questionnaires. RESULTS: Participation in the ETWBC increased student's midwives confidence (measured using knowledge and skills scales); Bereavement support skills [F(2,72) = 21.150, p < .000, partial eta squared = 0.370] and Bereavement support knowledge [F(1.6,60) = 48.460, p < .000, partial eta squared = 0.567]to provide bereavement care. Improvement in Student Midwives' level of self-awareness of the needs of bereaved parents [F(2,72 )= 20.311, p < .000, partial eta squared = 0.361] and of their own personal needs [F (1.7, 61) = 30.387, p < .000, partial eta squared = 0.458] in relation to providing bereavement support were also found. CONCLUSION: Participation in the Education Training Workshop on Bereavement Care helped increase student midwives confidence to provide bereavement care to grieving parents and to increase their self-awareness around their clinical practice in this area. The ETWBC is recommended as a brief effective educational intervention for inclusion in Midwifery curricula which could be modified for use with other relevant professional groups.

A feasibility study of a multidimensional breastfeeding-support intervention in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is the optimum mode of infant feeding. Despite this, most global populations do not achieve the World Health Organisation's recommendation of exclusive breast milk for the first 6 months of life. Irish breastfeeding rates are among the lowest in Europe, necessitating a well-designed breastfeeding-support intervention. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a multidimensional breastfeeding intervention in a rural and an urban maternity setting in Ireland. DESIGN: A feasibility study of a breastfeeding-support intervention. SETTING: Participants were recruited from The National Maternity Hospital (Dublin, urban) and Wexford General Hospital (Wexford, rural). Questionnaires were completed antenatally, at 6 weeks postpartum and at 3 months postpartum to assess acceptability of the intervention and determine breastfeeding status. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women were recruited in the 3rd trimester, alongside a support partner. INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of an antenatal class (including the physiology and practical approaches to breastfeeding), a one-to-one breastfeeding consultation with a lactation consultant after birth, access to a breastfeeding helpline, online resources, and a postnatal breastfeeding support group which included a one-to-one consultation with the lactation consultant. RESULTS: One hundred women from The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin and 27 women from Wexford General Hospital were recruited. The antenatal class was attended by 77 women in Dublin and 23 in Wexford; thus, 100 women participated in the intervention. Seventy-six women had a one-to-one postnatal consultation with a lactation consultant in Dublin and 23 in Wexford. Fifty and 45 women in Dublin, and 15 and 15 in Wexford responded to the 6-week and 3-month questionnaires, respectively. At 3 months postpartum, 70% of respondents from Dublin and 60% from Wexford were breastfeeding. Mothers perceived the one-to-one consultation with the lactation consultant during postnatal hospitalization as the most helpful part of the intervention. Inclusion of a support partner was universally viewed positively as a means to support the mother's decision to initiate and continue breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: This multidimensional intervention is well-accepted and feasible to carry out within an Irish cohort, in both urban and rural areas. Data from this feasibility study will be used to design a randomized controlled trial of a breastfeeding-support intervention.

Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate midwife-led care (MLC) antenatal care compared with antenatal care provided in traditional obstetric-led hospital antenatal clinics (usual care). DESIGN: a mixed methods approach involving a chart audit, postal survey, focus group and in-depth interviews. SETTING: data were collected at a large maternity hospital and satellite clinics in Dublin from women attending for antenatal care between June 2011 and May 2012. PARTICIPANTS: 300 women with low-risk pregnancy who attended midwife-led antenatal care or usual clinics during the study period were randomly selected to participate. MEASUREMENTS: data were collected from 292 women׳s charts and from 186 survey participants (63% response rate). Nine women participated in in-depth interviews and a focus group. FINDINGS: MLC was as effective as usual care in relation to number of antenatal visits and ultrasound scans, referral to other clinicians, women׳s health in pregnancy, gestation at childbirth, and birth weight. Women attending MLC booked significantly earlier, fewer women attending MLC were admitted to hospital antenatally and more women breast fed their infant. Women attending MLC reported better choice and that shorter waiting times and having more time for discussion were important reasons for choosing MLC. Women attending MLC reported a better experience overall, and recorded better outcomes in relation to how they were treated, along with easier access to antenatal care and shorter waiting times to see a midwife. Although women attending MLC clinics reported higher satisfaction with the information that they received, they also identified that antenatal education could be improved in relation to labour, breast-feeding, depression and emotional well-being, and caring for the infant. KEY CONCLUSIONS: midwife-led antenatal care was as effective as usual care for women with low-risk pregnancy and better in relation to choice, breast feeding and women׳s experience of care.

Evaluating midwifery-led antenatal care: using a programme logic model to identify relevant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: a range of initiatives has been introduced in Ireland and internationally in recent years to establish midwifery-led models of care, generally aimed at increasing the choices available for women for maternity care. A midwifery-led antenatal clinic was first established at the study site (a large urban maternity hospital in Dublin) and extended over recent years. This paper reports on the design of an evaluation of these midwives clinics, in particular the use of a programme logic model to select outcomes to be included in the evaluation. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: the programme logic model is used to identify the theory of a programme and is an integrative framework for the design and analysis of evaluations using qualitative and quantitative methods. Through an inclusive approach, the aim was to identify the most relevant outcomes to be included in the evaluation, by identifying and linking programme (midwifery-led antenatal clinic) outcomes to the goals, inputs and processes involved in the production of these outcomes. METHODS: the process involved a literature review, a review of policy documents and previous reviews of the clinics, interviews with midwives, obstetricians and managers to identify possible outcomes, a focus group with midwives, obstetricians, managers and women who had attended the clinics to refine and prioritise outcomes, and a follow-up survey to refine and prioritise the outcomes identified and to identify sources of data on each outcome. FINDINGS: seven categories of outcomes were identified: (1) choice, (2) relationship/interaction with caregiver, (3) experience of care, (4) preparation and education for childbirth and parenthood, (5) effectiveness of care, (6) organisational outcomes, and (7) programme viability. A range of sources of information was identified for each outcome, including existing documentation and data, chart audit, survey of women, and interviews and focus groups with midwives, obstetricians, managers and women. CONCLUSIONS: the programme logic model provided an inclusive, systematic and transparent approach to identifying relevant outcomes to be included in the evaluation. The information obtained has been used since to design the evaluation project, which is currently being concluded.